- Release Notes
- Getting Started
- Setup and Configuration
- Automation Projects
- Dependencies
- Types of Workflows
- File Comparison
- Automation Best Practices
- Source Control Integration
- Debugging
- The Diagnostic Tool
- Workflow Analyzer
- About Workflow Analyzer
- ST-NMG-001 - Variables Naming Convention
- ST-NMG-002 - Arguments Naming Convention
- ST-NMG-004 - Display Name Duplication
- ST-NMG-005 - Variable Overrides Variable
- ST-NMG-006 - Variable Overrides Argument
- ST-NMG-008 - Variable Length Exceeded
- ST-NMG-009 - Prefix Datatable Variables
- ST-NMG-011 - Prefix Datatable Arguments
- ST-NMG-012 - Argument Default Values
- ST-NMG-016 - Argument Length Exceeded
- ST-DBP-002 - High Arguments Count
- ST-DBP-003 - Empty Catch Block
- ST-DBP-007 - Multiple Flowchart Layers
- ST-DBP-020 - Undefined Output Properties
- ST-DBP-023 - Empty Workflow
- ST-DBP-024 - Persistence Activity Check
- ST-DBP-025 - Variables Serialization Prerequisite
- ST-DBP-026 - Delay Activity Usage
- ST-DBP-027 - Persistence Best Practice
- ST-DBP-028 - Arguments Serialization Prerequisite
- ST-USG-005 - Hardcoded Activity Arguments
- ST-USG-009 - Unused Variables
- ST-USG-010 - Unused Dependencies
- ST-USG-014 - Package Restrictions
- ST-USG-020 - Minimum Log Messages
- ST-USG-024 - Unused Saved for Later
- ST-USG-025 - Saved Value Misuse
- ST-USG-026 - Activity Restrictions
- ST-USG-027 - Required Packages
- ST-USG-028 - Restrict Invoke File Templates
- Variables
- Arguments
- Imported Namespaces
- Recording
- UI Elements
- Control Flow
- Selectors
- Object Repository
- Data Scraping
- Image and Text Automation
- Automating Citrix Technologies
- RDP Automation
- Salesforce Automation
- SAP Automation
- VMware Horizon Automation
- Logging
- The ScreenScrapeJavaSupport Tool
- The WebDriver Protocol
- Test Suite - Studio
- Extensions
- Troubleshooting
- About troubleshooting
- Microsoft App-V support and limitations
- Internet Explorer X64 troubleshooting
- Microsoft Office issues
- Identifying UI elements in PDF with Accessibility options
- Repairing Active Accessibility support
- JxBrowser applications troubleshooting
- User Events Monitoring
- Citrix Troubleshooting
- Automating Applications Running Under a Different Windows User
Activity Coverage
You can use the workflow activity coverage panel to check whether your test cases have been covered or not and look for redundancies. The test execution results are shown in Test Explorer, in the Activity Coverage panel. The coverage calculations are done by the Robot.
You can analyze the workflow's activity coverage, debug newly created test case, and view covered and uncovered activities.
To support your workflow debugging, you can see the traversed path, by going to Test Explorer, opening the Activity Coverage panel and double-clicking the test case. You can see the path highlighted in green and any skipped activities in red. Additionally,
you can quickly identify whether a test case has passed 
or failed 
and view the result.
Consider the partial coverage rate of the following workflow that automates a loan management process.
In this high-volume short-term loan scenario, the activity coverage result shows that 53% of the workflow activities were covered during execution. This flowchart uses a Flow Switch activity. You can create another test case to follow the execution of different scenario, for low-volume loans. Therefore, depending on your automation needs, you can create separate test cases to cover each scenario during the execution.
The following full coverage rate scenario tests all activities, for automating the UiBank app for applying for a loan. This workflow uses an XLSX file to import test data as part of data-driven testing using Test Data File.
The activity coverage results show a 100% coverage rate, meaning that the data set used in the test case, together with the added activities went through all possible scenarios.
